A Rejection of Mediocrity

The first sin that was ever committed, and every sin since, all sprang from pride.

“How you are fallen from heaven, O Day Star, son of Dawn! How you are cut down to the ground, you who laid the nations low! You said in your heart, ‘I will ascend to heaven; above the stars of God I will set my throne on high; I will sit on the mount of assembly in the far reaches of the north; I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High.’ But you are brought down to Sheol, to the far reaches of the pit.”

That is what “Lucifer”, the “Day Star”, said in his arrogance. It was said also of Nebuchadnezzar, for he was fueled by pride similar to Lucifer’s.

Satan’s fall was not merely about getting worship due to God. It was about status. “I will set my throne on high.” “I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will make myself like the Most High.” Satan’s pride deceived him into thinking that God was like him.

This is the lie that Satan has sold to hundreds of thousands of people through the ages. The Mormon heresy that Elohim was once a human who ascended to Godhood….Hinduism, which teaches that humans can achieve oneness with the Brahmin by repeated purification and reincarnation….Buddhism, which pretends that we can achieve divinity in meditation….all of these false religions preach that we can attain to Godhood.

It’s preposterous, of course. But it’s the lie that people tell themselves. “I can be like God.” When people create an idol of God with their minds—a God who won’t judge them for their sins—they are pretending that they can be greater than God.

Anyone who is foolish enough to believe that he can become greater than God is foolish enough to believe that he can bring God down to his level. This was the fallacy that Satan fell prey to when he tried to tempt Jesus.

It wasn’t just about worship. He was trying to get God to sin. He wanted to prove to the universe that God was no better than the angels. He had believed that from the beginning, and in the incarnation of Christ he saw his chance to prove it.

Of course, this only factored into God’s divine plan. Jesus proved Himself completely unsusceptible to temptation. The devil’s mind was again proven false. And because of this, it can be said (as Paul said): “For we do not have a High Priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but One who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin.”

Here’s a question. If Jesus wasn’t God, and all Satan needed to “win” was for Jesus to sin once, why didn’t Satan simply say, “let me worship you”? It’s a lot simpler to receive worship than it is to give worship. And if Jesus wasn’t God, then receiving worship would have been a sin.

We who know God laugh at how preposterous it would be to imagine Jesus worshipping the devil. But unless Jesus was God, then He would have been sinning if He had allowed the devil to worship Him.

David

Working in a fast-paces restaurant half the week and living at a secular university invites a good deal of foul language. At times, it’s rubbed off on me. I’ve had to watch my language at times; now and then I let expletives slip under my breath. It’s one of many things I’ve been convicted about, and one of many things God is working on in my life.

I still use exclamations that make some people uncomfortable. “Gosh” is technically a euphemism derived from “God”, but it’s developed enough of an identity of its own that I don’t equate it with blasphemy.

“Gosh, these hot wings are amazing.”

But every now and then, so-called “minced oaths” are really inadequate. Particularly when I’m really glad at something God’s done. Things that He does deserve an exclamation of surprise more illustrative of awe. “Gosh, I’m blessed” is almost blasphemous in its disconcern.

Would it be less blasphemous (or altogether profitable) to use God’s name as an expression of the scale of awe and gratitude you feel for what He’s done?

“God, I’m thankful for grace.”

It’s one thing to use God’s name in place of a four-letter word. But reverse blasphemy poses an interesting question, I think.

David

Someone asked me about whether healing services are Christian. Here’s a short summary of what’s wrong with the mindset of services like this….

There are people who are Christians who go to healing services. And they say that it’s a Christian thing.

But it’s not something that God encourages or teaches. People like to pretend that they can get things for themselves…health, wealth, or prosperity…by saying the right incantations or reading Bible verses in the right order. God isn’t impressed by those things. He’s not some big white-haired man in the sky, waiting for us to get the right sequence of phrases in order. He’s not controlled by us.

People who think they can control God don’t know God.

God’s will is a lot cleaner and straighter than ours. He uses joy and pain and health and suffering and wealth and poverty to glorify Himself. A healing service says, “God exists to make our lives happy; we just have to do the right things in the right order.” God says, “You exist so that I can use your life to bring myself glory…I will do what I will, regardless of what you think you’re doing.”

The people at healing services usually take pieces of Bible verses and twist them to make them seem like promises. Then they drum up a lot of emotion in the audience. They appeal to superstition and use cheap tricks to convince people that God is present…when He’s no where close.

Right now all I can taste are bitter tears
And right now all I can see are clouds of sorrow
From the other side of all this pain
Is that You I hear
Laughing loud, and calling out to me

And saying, see-
It’s everything you said that it would be
And even better than you would believe
And I’m counting down the days
Until you’re here with me
And finally you’ll see

But right now all I can say is, Lord, how long
Before You come and take away this aching
This night of weeping seems to have no end
But when the morning light breaks through
We’ll open up our eyes and we will see

It’s everything He said that it would be
And even better than we would believe
And He’s counting down the days
Till He says, “Come with me”
And finally

He’ll wipe every tear from our eyes
And make everything new
Just like He promised
Wait and see…just wait and see….
Wait and see

And I’m counting down the days until I see
It’s everything He said that it would be
And even better than we would believe
And I’m counting down the days
Till He says, “Come with me”
And finally, we’ll see….

Literally hundreds of books, websites, and even movies have been made about Noah’s Ark. Hundreds of presentations – but they have all been fiction.

But I am here to tell you that “Noah’s Ark” has been found.

“And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar, and they dwelt there.” Genesis 11:2

God’s Word gives us two clues concerning the location of the Ark that He commanded Noah to build to escape the Flood of Judgment. The first is that the ark “came to rest on the mountains of Ararat.” The second is that the location is almost due east of the “land of Shinar”. This is now northern Iraq.

Noah’s Ark has been called a myth, a legend, and a fairytale. But Dr. Bob Cornuke, a Biblical archeologist who has led searches for many Biblical events and locations, believed God’s Word. Based on a few Biblical clues and the testimony of an army sergeant engineer during World War II named Ed Davis, he became convinced that the true location of the Ark was somewhere in Iran.

Dr. Cornuke led an expedition to try and find Noah’s Ark in the mountains of Northern Iran along with such notables as Barry Rand (former CEO of Avis), the author and Christian apologist Josh McDowell, Frank Turek (co-author with Norm Geisler of I Don’t Have Enough Faith to be an Atheist), Boone Powell (former CEO of Baylor Medical Systems), and Arch Bonnema. They found a huge pile of petrified wood on the top of Mt. Sabalon at 15,300 feet above sea level – one thousand feet higher than Pike’s Peak in Colorado. The wood was darker than the surrounding rock and appeared to have been dyed black with pitch or some other dark substance.

The long, hand-hewn timbers sticking out of the mountain were squared off at the ends. Pictures show that the timbers were between one and two feet thick. The pile is about 400 feet long and is surrounded by marine fossils that originated under water.

Copyright laws prevent me from posting photographs here, but you can see a video and seventeen high-resolution photographs at www.arkfever.com.

However, I do have terrible news for you. This find, incredible as it is, will not trigger a huge rush of converts to Jesus Christ. Some may be convinced by the preponderance of evidence. Oh, but the turnout will be small – very small.

A famous atheist once said, “Even if they find a big boat up on Mount Ararat and drag it down Main Street, I wouldn’t believe that there was a worldwide flood. I wouldn’t believe that there is a God.” A famous man – Jesus Christ – once said that even if a man were to rise from the dead, people would still not believe.

There were thousands of people before the Flood that saw Noah’s Ark for almost a hundred years. Yet only eight escaped the Judgment of God. Why will it be any different today? There is a judgment coming. Jesus said that unless our righteousness exceeds that of the Pharisees, the most perfect people on the earth, then we will by no means enter the kingdom of God. He said that all liars will have their place in the Lake of Fire that burns for ever and ever. “All liars” is pretty inclusive. It means Hitler. It means Stalin. But it also means Mother Theresa. It also means Oprah. It also means you and me and your next-door neighbor. All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.

There is only one name given under heaven by which men might be saved, and that is the name of Jesus Christ. He took the sin of the entire world on His shoulders two thousand years ago. The wrath God had for us was poured out on Him, and only by trusting in Him alone for forgiveness of our sins can we escape the wrath of God.

Noah’s Ark is an amazing discovery that will bolster the faith of many and may even push some over the edge. But it is not a license to send a non-Christian an email and let “the evidence” do the rest. It will never replace the holy conviction of the Holy Spirit that comes from the Holy Law of God – the Ten Commandments.

In Him,

David S. MacMillan III

This article was first posted at Regenerate Our Culture. It is part of the July 4, 2006 Noah’s Ark blogburst.

“When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands that have connected them to another, and to assume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal station which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle….”

If you are an average American reader, then it took you about twelve or thirteen seconds to read the foregoing quote from the Declaration of Independence. In that time period, twenty human beings who had never experienced the love of Christ died and went to Hell.

A liberal estimate places the number of born-again Christians at somewhere around 7% of the world’s population of 6 billion. One hundred and fifty thousand people will die every twenty-four hours. These statistics give rise to a few statistics that are even more interesting – and sobering:

• In the time it takes you to change the dial on your car radio, 3 unsaved people die.
• During an average TV commercial “hook”, 22 unsaved humans meet their Maker.
• While you take a shower (assuming that to take ten minutes), almost a thousand non-Christians die.
• The average church service: 5,800 people go to Hell.
• A youth group meeting in an average American church: over ten thousand people go to Hell.
• During a Christian rock concert: a group of people equivalent to more than a thirtieth of the population of Washington, DC perish forever.

Do those statistics surprise you? They should at least make you think.

Recently, an “evangelical” leader was quoted as saying, “When you are on an airplane, you should never witness to the person you are sitting next to.” Ostenibly because they might feel “trapped”.

Fine. What are you going to tell God when He asks you, “I gave you two hours next to a person who desperately needed to hear My Gospel. As he left the airport, he was hit by a bus and slipped into a coma. He died a week later, never once coming out of the coma. Why didn’t you witness to him?”

It is said that only two things last forever: the Word of God and the souls of men. Every human being on this planet will spend eternity in either Heaven or Hell. If you are a Christian, it is your duty to share the Gospel with every single person you possibly can. Do not wait for God to tell you to witness; He already has. Remember that even though we are not judged by our works as Christians, we will still be required to give an account of every word, thought, and deed. Only what is done for Christ will last.

Keep going until the net is full!

In Him,

David S. MacMillan III

P.S. While you read this article, one hundred and ninety-six unsaved people died. From here on out, it’s up to you.

Reader RC directed me to an excellent post on his blog in reference to the PCUSA’s decision to include Mother, Child, Womb as a “reclamation” of the Trinity. I blogged about this in my last post here.

The new push centers around the idea that the conventional Trinitarian view is somehow “outdated” and needs to be “reclaimed”. Subsequent to that thread, Presbyterian Charles Wiley came up with a set of “rules” to create new versions of the Trinity – some of the results were “Mother, Child, Womb” and “Lover, Beloved, Love”. I figured that under the same rules we could use “Hen, Door, Blanket” – but that’s just me.

One version that I hadn’t heard about was shown me by RC at his post. This made me positively sick:

Rainbow, Ark, and Dove

RC made a very good point. As Jesus hung on the cross, bearing the sins of the entire world, separated from His Father, he didn’t cry out “My Rainbow, My Rainbow, why have you forsaken me?”

It is one thing to compare the attributes of Almighty God to a Rock, a King, or a Door. But it is another thing altogether to call the Holy Creator of the Universe “Rainbow”, “Compassionate Mother”, or “Lover”. This is called sacrilege. That’s a word that has been misused in the past again and again, but this is a time it can be pulled out of the closet, dusted off, and put to excellent use.

“From the creation of the world, God’s invisible attributes are clearly clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, so that mankind is without excuse.”

They changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever.”

When we reject God’s Law and interspose our own ideas about Him, suppressing the truth in ungodliness, we are setting ourselves up for His judgment. Don’t believe me? Read Romans 1 and consider what has happened in mainstream “churches” like Anglicanism that has now ordained and made normal practicing homosexual “bishops”. This isn’t about denominational issues – this is about exchanging the Truth of God for a Lie. On which side do you stand? God has appointed a day that He will judge the world in righteousness, and He will require an account of your every thought, word, and deed. He says that a place has been made for whoever “loves and practices a lie” – that place is Hell. Eternity is a long time. If you died tonight, where would you be?

In Him,

David S. MacMillan III

Been listening to Way of the Master Radio. A lot.

The Presbyterian Church USA recently met for a convention. A lot of churches are doing that lately.

One of the resolutions that came up at the convention involved a benchmark of Christianity – the Trinity. The fundamental doctrine espoused in the Nicean Creed that the Godhead is composed of three individual, distinct persons/personalities with one fundamental essence and being: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.

Presbyterian Charles Wiley feels that the Trinity needs to be “Reclaimed”. It is apparent from his writing that the “Father, Son, Holy Spirit” is really just an analogy but it is outdated so any analogical approach is good and we need to come up with more terms to express the Trinity. Et cetera.

Mr. Wiley even has developed a set of rules to guide the formation of new Trinity threesomes.

We are able to draw from the well of Scripture to enrich the ways we speak of God and to God.

This liberating approach also demands discipline. We cannot “pick one from column a, one from column b and one from column c,” as if any three terms can express Trinity. Are there “rules” to be followed, then? Yes. In the same manner that grammar rules help us to be clear about what we say, the rules of Trinitarian language help us to be faithful to what we believe.

In that spirit, I propose three rules:

1. The three terms must have an inner relationship.
2. The terms must either be personal or functional—the two should not be mixed.
3. Functional terms cannot replace personal terms, but can amplify and enrich our understanding of God.

As might be expected, they have come up with some very far-out “versions” of the Trinity (this includes those on thePC-USAA website and a few others I have heard on this basis):

• The One to Whom, the One by Whom, and the One in Whom we offer our praise
• Speaker, Word and Breath
• Overflowing Font, Living Water, Flowing River
• Compassionate Mother, Beloved Child and Life-giving Womb
• Our Sun, Ray and Warmth
• Lover, Beloved, Love
• Rock, Cornerstone and Temple
• The Fire that Consumes, the Hammer that Breaks, the Storm that Melts Mountains

Okay, the last one is not that bad, but it still should not be used to “Reclaim the Trinity”. But “Our Sun, Ray, and Warmth”?

And “Mother, Child, Womb”? Is it just me, or do I detect a little attempt to introduce feminism here?

“Lover, Beloved, Love”? This is getting sticky here.

God is not a big ball of fire in the sky that keeps us warm. He is not Mommy. And He is not the cosmic girlfriend/boyfriend either. He is an awesome, just, powerful Creator and Judge whose wrath is revealed against all ungodliness and unrighteousness.

Yes, God loves you. But it isn’t a pampering love. I repeat, God is NOT your cosmic girlfriend with a human-shaped hole in His heart. The love that He has is a perfecting love – He sacrificed His life so that our debt to justice would be paid and we could grow to be like Him.

Get it straight, Mr. Wiley. I am sure that you meant well. But this is too important to miss.

If you want to find out more about how the Trinity “works”, check out my article on the subject.

So do you think that the PC-USA went overboard in voting to accept “Mother, Child, Womb” as a “Reclamation” of the Trinity? “PC” … Politically Correct? How about Biblically Correct?

In Him,

David S. MacMillan III

Story found at EnGadget.com.

---

Look. I have no problem whatsoever with immigration. Granted, you should probably speak English or at least want to learn how before coming to the U.S. of A., and you’ll have to leave your flag behind you, but if you think about it all of our ancestors were once immigrants so a bias against legal immigration is just plain irrational.But illegal immigration is a different thing altogether. Rather than coming in like respectable people, illegal immigrants want to take our Social Security and our police protection and our governmental system (which, by the way, is the best in the world) and refuse to pay taxes to support it. All this while stubbornly refusing to learn English and hanging on to their own culture to the exclusion of an American way of life.

I am all in favor of a zero-tolerance policy in the realm of illegal immigration. If some guy comes to my front door, then fine. If he tries to jimmy his way in the back window, he will probably find himself full of buckshot. Honesty is always the best policy.

Texas (yee-hah!) governor Rick Perry has announced a revolutionary plan to solve the border crises that floods Texas will illegal immigrants every day. His idea: use the Internet and high-speed digital cameras to automatically create thousands of unpaid border control agents across the United States.

Perry estimates that the system would cost about $5,000,000, a small price to pay in exchange for the power would be created. Voyeuristic web surfers would be able to view live streams of the Texas-Mexico border 24/7 and have a toll-free number to report illegals trying to enter. This is all part of Perry’s $20 million plan to secure the Texas border without any federal help.

Sounds good to me! Texas forever!

In Him,

David S. MacMillan III

A few days ago, one of my readers left a comment that referred me to a blog called “GoodMath where one more liberal evolutionist had written a post attempting to debunk another one of Dembski’s speculations. Of course, the speculation of Dembski was in no way related to my personal beliefs, but that didn’t stop the reader!

Rather than try and defend Dembski, I pointed the reader – and the author of GoodMath – to one of my posts that starts from the ground up in explaining a particular piece of scientific evidence that supports the idea of a Creator – namely, the formation of life. The post uses only mathematics, common sense, and data from the secular Nature magazine.

Trying to be fair, I also left a comment on the GoodMath site referencing my post – in case he wanted to try and debunk it. Which he promptly tried to do.

My initial argument was pretty simple: the odds for the formation of the simplest possible reproducing, living cell (from the Nature article) by random chance are greater than the most improbable set of odds in this universe. By definition it is therefore impossible for the simplest possible reproducing, living cell to arise by random chance.

His “rebuttal” was this: typing a random string of keys and calculating the odds of getting that particular result. Even though the odds are greater than 1 in 10⁸⁰, it still happened, right?

I wonder what is wrong here. . . .

I already have a pretty good idea what the matter is with this obviously flawed argument. Care to guess?

In Him,

David S. MacMillan III

Nope. Not for me at least.

---

Ultimate Frisbee, for those of you who are so unfortunate as to have never played it, is a variation on a game of American football played with a Frisbee disc. The object is to pass the disc forward, backward, or sideways down the field and into the end zone for a touchdown. The catch is that when you have the disc you cannot move. If the disc touches the ground, the other team immediately takes possession.

Because of this game’s versatility, ease of play, and relative safety, it is extremely popular with many colleges and youth programs. It is the “official sport” of TeenPact.

However, I found out the hard way on Memorial Day evening that Ultimate is not really a no-contact sport. At least it isn’t when you are:

• Playing at night
• With a Disc Golf disc instead of an Ultimate Frisbee
• On wet grass
• On a small field
• With 11-year-old girls who don’t know how to throw a Frisbee

As my team advanced up the 10-or-so meter field, one of my sister’s friends caught my pass and found herself blocked by another player. So, she decided to pass it to me.

We were playing with a disc golf putter. Not only is this disc much harder to catch, but it also weighs between a quarter and a half a pound and is much more compact than a traditional frisbee. And, it was thrown at six feet in the air from only a few yards away at a speed that I didn’t know the girl possessed.

And I am six feet – and three inches – which places my eye level at approximately six feet in the air.

Needless to say, I ended up in the Emergency room at 2 AM the day after Memorial Day with blurred vision, a bleeding face, a black eye, difficulty focusing or moving my eye, and a really bad headache. Plus sensitivity to light in both eyes and a host of other minor aches and pains – including the whiplash I got when the impacting frisbee made my neck snap back and threw me to the ground. One word: Ouch.

Just a little update on the life of David S. MacMillan III….

---

Despite my aching head, I will be making a few more posts in the near future. They will tackle such tough subjects and questions as:

• Do angels “live” in time or eternity?
• Why this unscientific rebuttal is really quite absurd and depressing.
• The Final Solution to the illegal immigration problem – you?
• The discussion over my last post.

In the first century AD, the followers of Jesus Christ met mostly in homes for meals and fellowship, and spoke publicly in synagogues and marketplaces only to portray the message: “Repent, for the kingdom of God is at hand!” The informal home assemblies focused on edifying the believer, strengthening his or her faith, and equipping each person to more effectively share the Gospel and live for Christ.

Teaching varied greatly depending upon the audience. In a Christian environment, believers encouraged one another with the Scriptures, the letters from the apostles to the churches, and with the promise of God’s grace. However, in a secular environment Christians preached the law of God and the terrible reality of His righteous judgment on those who rejected Jesus as their Messiah. Their purpose in these settings was to bring unsaved people to a knowledge of their sin and a knowledge of the Gospel.

The Biblical way of “sermonizing” was Law to the proud, Grace to the humble.

Now, skipping forward 1900 years. . . .

Today’s “sermon” follows a much different tack. Generally a pastor is preaching to an audience that has both Christians and non-Christians in it, so he must try and appeal to both crowds equally. The mixed group, however, prevents him from using the law – it would confuse and condemn the Christians – or from speaking about grace – it would be “foolishness to those that are perishing” (1 Corinthians 1:18).

So today’s sermon is forced into a tight mold that constrains it from displaying the true Word of God. A “good” pastor today will usually give a watered-down version of Grace:

God loves you and has a wonderful plan for your life. If you are a Christian, come up front! We can help you to live God’s wonderful plan even more. If you aren’t a Christian, you need to ask Jesus into your heart so that you can start living God’s wonderful plan! Either way, come down to the altar and pray with one of our qualified advisors!

Sound familiar? Sadly, attempts to cater to a mixed crowd has turned the Gospel into a “contemporary” message of happiness and contentment through saying “the prayer”. No wonder most Americans live like Pollyanna.

Organized religious Christianity has done much for the Gospel – but it really has not done much good. Rather than equipping believers and saving the lost, it has presented an unbiblical “Jesus message” that is producing greater and greater numbers of false converts every day. No where in the Bible do we find one of the apostles saying, “Pray this prayer with me and Jesus will come into your heart.” Nor do we find the “life enhancement” message so prevalent in our “Christian” culture today.

Remember: Law to the proud, Grace to the humble.

Jesus changed His message based on who He was speaking to. Why shouldn’t we?

In Him,

David S. MacMillan III

A few days ago, I came across this post over at Agent Tim’s Blog. It spoke about a letter to the editor that was published in the Daily Record on May 21. The writer of this letter, Jeffrey Huppert, claimed among other things that America was not a Christian nation and that most if not all the Founders were deists. Naturally, I had to set the record straight.

I sent the following letter in to the Daily Record, but they truncated it quite a bit when it was actually published. Oh well! I got at least part of the word across.

---

While surfing the blogosphere, I came across a link to a letter to the editor in the Daily Record titled “America not a Christian Nation”. I would appreciate it if certain people would take the time to get their facts straight.

The only accurate statement in the letter was the opening sentence:

“A recent letter claimed that the United States was founded on Christian thought.”

Jeffrey H., the reader who penned (or typed) the letter, apparently believes that the thousands of quotes from the Founding Fathers expounding upon the attributes of Jesus Christ are somehow irrelevant to the question of whether any of the Founders were Christian. I suppose that these letters, treatises, and speeches are the result of a massive conspiracy by the incorrigible Republicans to fool all the innocent populace.

Mr. H. states that “References to gods and religions are purposely left out of the Constitution and Bill of Rights, as well as all amendments.” This absence of direct reference to God in the articles of governmental arrangement obviously proves something. I’m just not sure what.

I suppose that Mr. H. has never read the Declaration of Independence, the founding document of the United States. It states expressly that the inalienable rights given to men by Creator God form the basis for all government – and especially the United States government!

And it gets worse.

“The founders wanted government to leave religions alone and equally wanted religions to leave government alone. [...] Neither Franklin, Washington nor Jefferson believed in a personal God.”

It is becoming increasingly obvious that fewer and fewer people know how to accurately examine source documents. In Benjamin Franklin’s 1749 plan of education for the public schools of Pennsylvania, he insisted that schools teach “the necessity of a public religion . . . and the excellency of the Christian religion above all others, ancient or modern.” Likewise, Washington claimed on May 12, 1779, that what children needed to learn “above all” was the “religion of Jesus Christ,” and that to learn this would make them “greater and happier than they already are”. During the winter of 1777 in Valley Forge he charged his soldiers at Valley Forge that “To the distinguished character of patriot, it should be our highest glory to add the more distinguished character of Christian”.

Jefferson was another Founder who supposedly lacked belief in God or Christianity. And yet he himself stated “I am a real Christian, that is to say a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus Christ.” The very word “Christ” means Savior or Messiah.

In the words of David Barton of Wallbuilders Ministries:

“Perhaps critics should spend more time reading the writings of the Founders to discover their religious beliefs for themselves rather than making such sweeping accusations which are so easily disproven.”

Please get your facts straight.

In Him,

David S. MacMillan III

---

You can view the truncated version here, but they left out most of the best part. Phooey.

In Him,

David S. MacMillan III

Breaking News

Last night, the TeenPact primary election ballot for the 2006 National Convention opened up for absentee voting!

If you have ever attended a TeenPact 4-day State class, you are eligible to vote. Here’s how it works:

Go to http://teenpact.com/elections/primary_parties.html and select your party. Each year, TeenPact chooses a hot political topic and creates several parties with different platforms in order to divide the candidates up. This year, the subject was illegal immigration, and the three parties were More Minute Men, Christian Amnesty, and Bush Guest Worker.

The More Minute Men party is clearly the best choice. Why? Not only are all the cool candidates running in this party, but this is the only party that can include the proper response to the illegal immigration problem: snipers and land mines. Understand, I have no problem with immigration; our ancestors all came here as immigrants at one time or another. But I do have a big problem with illegal immigrants who seek to leach money out of our government without paying taxes.

So, when you go to the elections, select the “More Minute Men” party. For the presidency, vote for Daniel Monplaisir and Anna Boyles. They are undoubtedly the best candidates for the presidency.

For the Senate and House of Representatives, I can only suggest that you vote for Chip Cocks for Senate and Paul Martin for the House. They both staffed my TeenPact state class this last year and are really great guys. And Chip is awesome at Ultimate Frisbee, too. . . .

So get out and VOTE!

In Him,

David S. MacMillan III

A quick Google search for “combat, attack, unbiblical, or false Da Vinci Code” just turned up almost ten million hits. Organized religion has definitely come out in force against this particular “heresy”.

Yesterday marked the premier of the film production of Dan Brown’s bestselling novel, The Da Vinci Code. Today, millions more Americans went to see the action-packed thriller that has truly captivated the minds of everyone – whether they be for it or against it.

According to a statistic from an article by Rod Martin, of the 45 million people who read the book, ninety-five percent state that it has not caused them to change any of their beliefs or religious perspectives because of the book’s content. In other words, this book will probably not have a terrific impact on the average person who already has some set religious ideas.

Nevertheless, I joined the hype this afternnoon by placing 50 $10,000 bills in car windshield wipers at the local theater. These slightly oversized bills have an image of Mona Lisa on the front:This gospel tract in disguise is good because it does not attempt to go through and debunk each and every of the numerous factual errors in The Da Vinci Code. Rather, it takes what I would consider to be a more biblical approach; the back of the bill is as follows:

One of the most amazing claims of The Da Vinci Code is that Jesus married Mary Magdalene, and she then became the most important of the apostles. If this is true, then the New Testament cannot be trusted, and its entire inspiration is in question. Did you know that… [read more]

Read it.

Rather that attacking the book and the movie, the tract affirms the authenticity of the Bible and challenges the person on the basis of their conscience. It closes by showing The Da Vinci Code for what it really is:

If you choose to ignore the Bible’s warning, and instead believe the fantasies of The Da Vinci Code, then be aware that you have joined the “Elvis is Alive!” crowd. You’ve included yourself in the ranks of the wide-eyed and faithful tabloid customers. The choice, however, is yours. It’s your eternity.

A great tract. Like I said, the entire parking lot was peppered with them – while the film was showing. So when everyone came out they had $10,000 with Mona Lisa on the front under their windshield wipers. Hee hee hee. When we were about eighty percent done, one of the employees (who happened to be an old friend of mine) came out and asked us if we had a permit to do what we were doing. I told him that since we weren’t trying to sell anything, we didn’t need a permit – and gave him a copy for the road. He read through the whole thing and went back into the theater and showed it to the other employees.

What do you think a good response is to this phenomenon?

In Him,

David S. MacMillan III